Changes to proof

ffff:12.186.22.250
ffff:12.186.22.250
11 days ago
updated index.scroll
index.scroll
Changed around line 1
+ container
ffff:12.186.22.250
ffff:12.186.22.250
11 days ago
updated mito-division.scroll
mito-division.scroll
Changed around line 1
- claim New mitochondria arise from the growth and division of preexisting mitochondria, rather than forming de novo.
+ idea New mitochondria arise from the growth and division of preexisting mitochondria, rather than forming de novo.
ffff:12.186.22.250
ffff:12.186.22.250
11 days ago
updated mito-division.scroll
mito-division.scroll
Changed around line 11: experiment
- prediction
+ predictions
- Two distinct populations would appear - one labeled, one unlabeled
ffff:12.186.22.250
ffff:12.186.22.250
11 days ago
updated mito-division.scroll
mito-division.scroll
Changed around line 2: proof.parsers
- method
+ experiment
ffff:12.186.22.250
ffff:12.186.22.250
11 days ago
updated mito-division.scroll
mito-division.scroll
Changed around line 2: proof.parsers
- method
- 1. Culture Neurospora strain requiring choline in logarithmic growth phase
- 2. Supply radioactively labeled choline (membrane precursor)
- 3. Transfer to non-radioactive medium
- 4. At intervals, isolate mitochondria
- 5. Spread mitochondria on slides for autoradiography
- 6. Repeat similar experiment with Tetrahymena using tritiated thymidine to label mitochondrial DNA
- 7. Track label distribution for four generations
+ method
+ 1. Culture Neurospora strain requiring choline in logarithmic growth phase
+ 2. Supply radioactively labeled choline (membrane precursor)
+ 3. Transfer to non-radioactive medium
+ 4. At intervals, isolate mitochondria
+ 5. Spread mitochondria on slides for autoradiography
+ 6. Repeat similar experiment with Tetrahymena using tritiated thymidine to label mitochondrial DNA
+ 7. Track label distribution for four generations
- prediction
- If mitochondria form de novo:
- - Two distinct populations would appear - one labeled, one unlabeled
- If mitochondria divide from existing ones:
- - Label would be uniformly distributed among all mitochondria
+ prediction
+ If mitochondria form de novo:
+ - Two distinct populations would appear - one labeled, one unlabeled
+ If mitochondria divide from existing ones:
+ - Label would be uniformly distributed among all mitochondria
- results
- Neurospora experiment:
- - Label was uniformly distributed among all mitochondria
- Tetrahymena experiment:
- - Label remained evenly distributed among all mitochondria through four generations of growth
+ results
+ Neurospora experiment:
+ - Label was uniformly distributed among all mitochondria
+ Tetrahymena experiment:
+ - Label remained evenly distributed among all mitochondria through four generations of growth
- conclusion
- The uniform distribution of labels in both experiments supports the hypothesis that new mitochondria arise from growth and division of preexisting mitochondria. The persistence of evenly distributed label through multiple generations particularly strengthens this conclusion by showing consistent inheritance of mitochondrial components.
+ conclusion The uniform distribution of labels in both experiments supports the hypothesis that new mitochondria arise from growth and division of preexisting mitochondria. The persistence of evenly distributed label through multiple generations particularly strengthens this conclusion by showing consistent inheritance of mitochondrial components.
ffff:12.186.22.250
ffff:12.186.22.250
11 days ago
updated proof.parsers
proof.parsers
Changed around line 1
- hypothesisParser
+ claimParser
- cue hypothesis
+ cue claim
ffff:12.186.22.250
ffff:12.186.22.250
11 days ago
updated mito-division.scroll
mito-division.scroll
Changed around line 1
- proof
- hypothesis
- New mitochondria arise from the growth and division of preexisting mitochondria, rather than forming de novo.
+ claim New mitochondria arise from the growth and division of preexisting mitochondria, rather than forming de novo.
ffff:98.234.60.71
ffff:98.234.60.71
11 days ago
updated mito-division.scroll
mito-division.scroll
Changed around line 1
+ proof.parsers
+
ffff:98.234.60.71
ffff:98.234.60.71
11 days ago
updated mito-division.scroll
mito-division.scroll
Changed around line 1
+ proof
+ hypothesis
+ New mitochondria arise from the growth and division of preexisting mitochondria, rather than forming de novo.
+
+ method
+ 1. Culture Neurospora strain requiring choline in logarithmic growth phase
+ 2. Supply radioactively labeled choline (membrane precursor)
+ 3. Transfer to non-radioactive medium
+ 4. At intervals, isolate mitochondria
+ 5. Spread mitochondria on slides for autoradiography
+ 6. Repeat similar experiment with Tetrahymena using tritiated thymidine to label mitochondrial DNA
+ 7. Track label distribution for four generations
+
+ prediction
+ If mitochondria form de novo:
+ - Two distinct populations would appear - one labeled, one unlabeled
+ If mitochondria divide from existing ones:
+ - Label would be uniformly distributed among all mitochondria
+
+ results
+ Neurospora experiment:
+ - Label was uniformly distributed among all mitochondria
+ Tetrahymena experiment:
+ - Label remained evenly distributed among all mitochondria through four generations of growth
+
+ conclusion
+ The uniform distribution of labels in both experiments supports the hypothesis that new mitochondria arise from growth and division of preexisting mitochondria. The persistence of evenly distributed label through multiple generations particularly strengthens this conclusion by showing consistent inheritance of mitochondrial components.
ffff:98.234.60.71
ffff:98.234.60.71
11 days ago
created mito-division.scroll
mito-division.scroll